KTMDuke250STDvsKTMDuke250ABS

KTM Duke 250 2020-2023 vs KTM Duke 250 2020-2023: Specifications Comparison

• Brakes, Suspension & Tyres

  Braking System, Front Wheel Size, Wheel Type, Front Suspension

  Braking System	Dual Channel ABS	Dual Channel ABS
  Front Wheel Size	R17	R17
  Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy
  Front Suspension	WP Upside Down (USD) Forks	WP Upside Down (USD) Forks
  Rear Suspension	WP Monoshock	WP Monoshock
  Front Brake	Disc	Disc
  Rear Brake	Disc	Disc

  Collapse

• Engine & Transmission

  Gear Shifting Pattern, Engine Capacity, Engine Type, No. of Cylinders

  Gear Shifting Pattern	1 Down 5 Up	1 Down 5 Up
  Engine Capacity	248.8 cc	248.8 cc
  Engine Type	Single-cylinder, 4-stroke, DOHC, Liquid-cooled	Single-cylinder, 4-stroke, DOHC, Liquid-cooled
  No. of Cylinders	1	1
  Top Speed	148 kmph	148 kmph
  Bore x Stroke	72 mm X 61.1 mm	72 mm X 61.1 mm
  Cooling type	Liquid Cooled	Liquid Cooled
  Max Power	30 bhp @ 9000 rpm	30 bhp @ 9000 rpm
  Max Torque	24 Nm @ 7500 rpm	24 Nm @ 7500 rpm
  Number of Gears	6 Speed	6 Speed

  Collapse

• Comfort & Convenience

  Low Battery Indicator, Low Oil Indicator, Pillion Footrest, Under Seat Storage

  Low Battery Indicator
  Low Oil Indicator
  Pillion Footrest
  Engine Kill Switch
  Instrument Console	Digital	Digital
  Seat Style	Split	Split
  Start Type	Electric Start	Electric Start

  Collapse

• Safety

  Radial Tyres, Side Stand Alarm

  Radial Tyres
  Side Stand Alarm

  Collapse

• Instrumentation

  No. of Tripmeters, Tachometer, Speedometer, Odometer

  No. of Tripmeters	1	1
  Tachometer	Digital	Digital
  Speedometer	Digital	Digital
  Odometer	Digital	Digital

  Collapse

• Dimensions & Capacity

  Length, Width, Height, Wheelbase

  Length	2072 mm	2072 mm
  Width	831 mm	831 mm
  Height	1109 mm	830 mm
  Wheelbase	1357 mm	1357 mm
  Ground Clearance	151 mm	185 mm
  Fuel Tank Capacity	13.5 Litres	13.5 Litres
  Seat Height	823 mm	823 mm
  Unladden/Kerb Weight	169 kg	149 kg

  Collapse

• Pros & Cons

  Pros, Cons

  Pros	.Easy to ride Large fuel tank Spot on ergonomics	.Easy to ride Large fuel tank Spot on ergonomics
  Cons	expensinve in the segment Lack of low-end torque Not enough braking power	expensinve in the segment Lack of low-end torque Not enough braking power

  Collapse