What are the top competitors of Maruti Suzuki Ritz?
The top competitors for Maruti Suzuki Ritz are Renault Kwid, Maruti Suzuki S-Presso and Maruti Suzuki Alto K10 ranging from ₹ 3.99 Lakhs to ₹ 6.33 Lakhs. For detailed comparison please visit , and .
Explore more on Maruti Suzuki Suzuki Ritz 2009- 2016

₹ 4.30 - ₹ 6.58 Lakh *
(Price before discontinued)Maruti Suzuki Suzuki Ritz 2009- 2016 is Discontinued.
Ad
Other Maruti Suzuki Ritz 2009- 2016 FAQ's
Maruti Suzuki Suzuki Ritz 2009- 2016 Competitors
Ad
Explore More Options
Maruti Suzuki Suzuki Ritz 2009- 2016 Car Owner Reviews
4.2
191 ratings and reviews
- Performance 4.4
- Design4.4
- Mileage4.2
- View all parameters
Write A Review
All (119)Mileage(38)General(36)Comfort(32)Driving(27)Maintenance Cost(26)Show more
- vgvikash gupta26 Aug 20253.9Before purchasing any car, always check its safety features — because nothing is more important than life. A car should not only look good or perform well, but most importantly, it should protect you and your loved ones. Always prioritize your family's safety while making a decision. Stay safe, drive safe.LikeReplyRead more
- RrRavi rajput2 Month ago1.0This car is really good. I've driven it for 1,530,000 km over 9 years without a single issue. It's an amazing car. I think when Maruti launched the Ritz, it was a very good decision.LikeReplyRead more
- AAkash2 Month ago1.0Nice and superb car with awesome quality. It offers the best and quickest start, moves fast, and I love it so much. Definitely buy this car.LikeReplyRead more
- SSSher Singh2 Month ago1.0This is my first family car. It is very budget-friendly. The space is excellent. I love it so much. The pickup is very good, and the mileage is fantastic. It’s the best family car.LikeReplyRead more
- MManish2 Month ago1.0This is one of the best cars, offering excellent balance even at high speeds. It truly deserves a relaunch with modern upgrades like airbags, DRLs, and LED lights. With these features added, it would be a perfect fit for today’s drivers and road conditions.LikeReplyRead more
Ad