BajajPulsarNS400ZvsKTM160Duke

Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs KTM 160 Duke: Specifications Comparison

• Engine & Performance

  Engine Type, Fuel Type, Engine Capacity, Max Power

  Engine Type	Liquid Cooled & 4V & DOHC with 4 Stroke Single Cylinder	Liquid Cooled 4 stroke Single Cylinder SOHC Internal Combustion Engine All Variants
  Fuel Type	Petrol	Petrol All Variants
  Engine Capacity	349 cc	164.2 cc All Variants
  Max Power	40.04 Ps @ 9000 rpm	18.74 PS @ 9500 rpm All Variants
  Max Torque	33.2 Nm @ 7500 rpm	15.5 Nm @ 7500 rpm All Variants
  No. of Cylinders	1	1 All Variants
  Bore x Stroke	89 mm x 60 mm	66 mm X 48 mm All Variants
  Engine Oil Capacity	1.7 Liters Litres	1.25 Litres All Variants
  Number of Gears	6 Speed	Data Not Available
  Max Speed	157 kmph	Data Not Available
  Cooling type	Liquid Cooled	Liquid Cooled All Variants
  Clutch Type		Data Not Available
  Gear Shifting Pattern	1 Down 5 Up	1 Down 5 Up All Variants
  Riding Modes	4	Data Not Available
  Number of Spark Plugs		All Variants

  Collapse

• Chassis & Suspension

  Chassis/Frame Type, Front Suspension Type, Rear Suspension, Rear Suspension Travel

  Chassis/Frame Type	perimeter frame	Split-Trellis All Variants
  Front Suspension Type	Up Side Down	WP Apex upside-down (USD) forks
  Rear Suspension	Monoshock with Nitrox&6 step adjustable	WP Apex monoshock
  Rear Suspension Travel	Data Not Available	All Variants

  Collapse

• Brakes & Tyres

  Braking System, Front Brake Type, Rear Brake Type, Wheel Size

  Braking System	Dual Channel ABS	Dual Channel ABS All Variants
  Front Brake Type	Disc	Disc All Variants
  Rear Brake Type	Disc	Disc All Variants
  Wheel Size	R17	R17 All Variants
  Wheel Type	Alloy	Alloy All Variants
  Tyre Construction Type		All Variants

  Collapse

• Dimensions & Capacity

  Length, Width, Height, Wheelbase

  Length	1990 mm mm	2020 mm
  Width	846 mm mm	873 mm
  Height	1057 mm mm	822 mm
  Wheelbase	1346 mm mm	1357 mm
  Ground Clearance	168 mm mm	174 mm
  Seat Height	805 mm mm	815 mm All Variants
  Kerb Weight	176 Kg kg	147 kg All Variants
  Fuel Tank Capacity	12 Litres Litres	10.1 Litres All Variants

  Collapse

• Console & App Features

  Instrument Cluster, Touch Screen Display, Speedometer, Tachometer

  Instrument Cluster	Digital	Digital All Variants
  Speedometer	Digital	Digital All Variants
  Tachometer	Digital	Digital All Variants
  Gear Status Indicator		Data Not Available
  Distance to Empty Indicator
  Odometer	Digital	Digital All Variants
  Average Speed Indicator		All Variants
  Low Battery Indicator		All Variants
  Low Oil Indicator		All Variants
  Hazard Warning Indicator		All Variants
  GPS & Navigation		All Variants
  Call/SMS Alerts

  Collapse

• Rider & Pillion Features

  Seat Style, Handle Type, Start Type, USB Charging Port

  Seat Style	Split	Split All Variants
  Handle Type	Hydroformed Tubular Street Fighter Handlebar	Data Not Available
  Start Type	Self Start	Self Start All Variants
  USB Charging Port		All Variants
  Pillion Footrest		All Variants
  Pillion Grabrail		All Variants
  Riding Modes Switch

  Collapse

• Safety & Lighting

  Traction Control System, Hill Assist, Engine Braking System (EBS), Side Stand Warning Indicator

  Traction Control System		Data Not Available
  Side Stand Warning Indicator		All Variants
  Engine Kill Switch		All Variants
  Headlamps		All Variants
  Daytime Running Lights (DRL)		Data Not Available
  AHO (Automatic Headlight On)		All Variants
  Turn Indicators	LED	LED All Variants

  Collapse

• Warranty

  Standard Warranty, RoadSide Assistance

  Standard Warranty

  5 Years/75000 kms

  2 Years /30000 kms

  Collapse

• Pros & Cons

  Pros, Cons

  Pros	Superbly priced for the segment it belongs to Use of cycle parts from siblings makes the maintenance costs less Puch-packed performance from the engine Agile handling makes it fun to ride on the city streets Braking entices confidence inside the new riders	The highest performance numbers in this segment. Packs more features than most rivals. Gets switchable dual-channel ABS. Gets premium quality hardware.
  Cons	Design looks similar to the smaller N250 and NS200 Build quality could have been better considering the use of cycle parts Seat comfort is not as good as you would like it to be Barebone features like LCD console make it feel less premium	The design from the older series Duke simply looks too dated. The fuel tank is a puny 10.1-litre unit. The LCD screen may remind you of a Nokia 1100.

  Collapse

Visual Gallery

Bajaj Pulsar NS400ZKTM 160 Duke

Which Bike Do You Like More?

Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z

KTM 160 Duke